Friday, February 28, 2020

The allegory between wisdom and strength Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 words

The allegory between wisdom and strength - Essay Example To the left, there is a description on the pedestals of the column that has a quotation from Ecclesiastes, which is â€Å"All is Vanity†. It means that all earthly thing including power, nations, wars, kingship, love and strength and are hence meaningless comparing to heavenly ones, as embodied by Divine. This is evident in Baroque style of painting, representation of the divine in painting. In addition, the theme here is the strength of Hercules, which by no means is comparable to the virtues of divine understanding. Boucher’s position of the figures in the painting, he places the mighty Hercules below Wisdom, who almost slumps downwards. A divine light is above the head of the woman and has one of her breast exposed. Apparently, based on a celestial figure, the saintly woman stands on a small globe, which symbolizes the world as she cast her eyes up to the heavens. It could also suggest that the male (Hercules) is falling while female (Wisdom) is rising. The woman is surrounded by a blue sky while the man is surrounded by earth colors. One could argue that the painting is suggesting that the force fails when faced by gentleness. The halo of light, which is above the woman, is a reflection of her spiritual wisdom. The painting suggests the power harnessing outside the everyday. The structure and patterns that the two artist use, are derived from the energies of the personal unconscious and the collective unconscious. However, mythic images are not presented in the person unconscious.

Tuesday, February 11, 2020

Critique of a research paper Quantitative design Essay - 1

Critique of a research paper Quantitative design - Essay Example The researchers aimed at examining the progress of the Motivate Programme; an exercise, behaviour change and nutrition guided management programme, in terms of how it could help the select group of overweight and obese participants improve their cardiovascular risk factors (Rutherford et al, 2014). The aims lay out what the reader has to expect, and provide a basis to evaluate consistency in a research process (Boaz and Ashby, 2003). Highlighting the credentials of authors proves their experience in a field, and offers credibility to research (Vance et al, 2013). The institutional affiliations of all participants were clearly indicated in the article. Credibly, they were all affiliated to leading institutions in the United Kingdom. However, the educational attainments of the authors were not listed. The article was published in the journal Soccer and Society, a relatively new, peer reviewed journal database with a growing readership and specific focus on sociological, financial and scientific matters of soccer. A database that does not offer peer reviews has lower regard in the scholarly world, since evidence for clarification of the research process is a necessity for quality control (Rafols et al, 2012). Rychetnik et al. (2002) noted that the abstract should clearly summarize the main sections of an article. The abstract is clearly and systematically outlined to provide highlights of every major part of the article; the background, aims, methods, results and conclusion. A strong justification was offered to explain why they carried out the research, noting that the unique approach of the research (soccer-based exercises, unlike mere walking and running used in many research studies; and the location of recruitment). No clear research questions were provided to guide the research. Research questions are an important step in guiding readers of an article through the transition from the aims to the results. As such, sufficiency of research